<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The empire strikes back &#8211; media mogul versus the internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datadiary.com.au/2009/11/23/the-empire-strikes-back-media-mogul-versus-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datadiary.com.au/2009/11/23/the-empire-strikes-back-media-mogul-versus-the-internet/</link>
	<description>An investor&#039;s diary of economic data, corporate earnings and market sentiment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:50:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PazzoMundo</title>
		<link>http://www.datadiary.com.au/2009/11/23/the-empire-strikes-back-media-mogul-versus-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>PazzoMundo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pazzomundo.com/?p=611#comment-170</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dean,

Interesting perspective indeed.  Not sure I absolutely agree with some conclusions - by my definition iTunes is making its money as a form of media and people are paying for content (after all that is what they get for their $).

Was thinking that I&#039;d try and break down the value of content as another exercise.  Also, interested in exploring the changing dynamic in newspapers revenue/costs - cover price v advertising v the production costs.  Ah, as always too much to explore in so little time.

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dean,</p>
<p>Interesting perspective indeed.  Not sure I absolutely agree with some conclusions &#8211; by my definition iTunes is making its money as a form of media and people are paying for content (after all that is what they get for their $).</p>
<p>Was thinking that I&#8217;d try and break down the value of content as another exercise.  Also, interested in exploring the changing dynamic in newspapers revenue/costs &#8211; cover price v advertising v the production costs.  Ah, as always too much to explore in so little time.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PazzoMundo</title>
		<link>http://www.datadiary.com.au/2009/11/23/the-empire-strikes-back-media-mogul-versus-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>PazzoMundo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pazzomundo.com/?p=611#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dean,

Interesting perspective indeed.  Not sure I absolutely agree with some conclusions - by my definition iTunes is making its money as a form of media and people are paying for content (after all that is what they get for their $).

Was thinking that I&#039;d try and break down the value of content as another exercise.  Also, interested in exploring the changing dynamic in newspapers revenue/costs - cover price v advertising v the production costs.  Ah, as always too much to explore in so little time.

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dean,</p>
<p>Interesting perspective indeed.  Not sure I absolutely agree with some conclusions &#8211; by my definition iTunes is making its money as a form of media and people are paying for content (after all that is what they get for their $).</p>
<p>Was thinking that I&#8217;d try and break down the value of content as another exercise.  Also, interested in exploring the changing dynamic in newspapers revenue/costs &#8211; cover price v advertising v the production costs.  Ah, as always too much to explore in so little time.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.datadiary.com.au/2009/11/23/the-empire-strikes-back-media-mogul-versus-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pazzomundo.com/?p=611#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Vive la revolution indeed.
I came across this article today on the same topic and thought of you
http://www.paulgraham.com/publishing.html
Excellent perspective that old media has not been selling content, merely paper and won&#039;t be able to sell content in most cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vive la revolution indeed.<br />
I came across this article today on the same topic and thought of you<br />
<a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/publishing.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.paulgraham.com/publishing.html</a><br />
Excellent perspective that old media has not been selling content, merely paper and won&#8217;t be able to sell content in most cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.datadiary.com.au/2009/11/23/the-empire-strikes-back-media-mogul-versus-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pazzomundo.com/?p=611#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Vive la revolution indeed.
I came across this article today on the same topic and thought of you
http://www.paulgraham.com/publishing.html
Excellent perspective that old media has not been selling content, merely paper and won&#039;t be able to sell content in most cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vive la revolution indeed.<br />
I came across this article today on the same topic and thought of you<br />
<a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/publishing.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.paulgraham.com/publishing.html</a><br />
Excellent perspective that old media has not been selling content, merely paper and won&#8217;t be able to sell content in most cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PazzoMundo</title>
		<link>http://www.datadiary.com.au/2009/11/23/the-empire-strikes-back-media-mogul-versus-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>PazzoMundo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pazzomundo.com/?p=611#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Touche Dean,

If only they had a media mogul to manage them through the decline.  It is a fair argument against backing companies where the management&#039;s alignment of interest is limited to drawing a hefty salary with a few stock options thrown in.

Vive la revolution!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touche Dean,</p>
<p>If only they had a media mogul to manage them through the decline.  It is a fair argument against backing companies where the management&#8217;s alignment of interest is limited to drawing a hefty salary with a few stock options thrown in.</p>
<p>Vive la revolution!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PazzoMundo</title>
		<link>http://www.datadiary.com.au/2009/11/23/the-empire-strikes-back-media-mogul-versus-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>PazzoMundo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pazzomundo.com/?p=611#comment-179</guid>
		<description>Touche Dean,

If only they had a media mogul to manage them through the decline.  It is a fair argument against backing companies where the management&#039;s alignment of interest is limited to drawing a hefty salary with a few stock options thrown in.

Vive la revolution!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touche Dean,</p>
<p>If only they had a media mogul to manage them through the decline.  It is a fair argument against backing companies where the management&#8217;s alignment of interest is limited to drawing a hefty salary with a few stock options thrown in.</p>
<p>Vive la revolution!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.datadiary.com.au/2009/11/23/the-empire-strikes-back-media-mogul-versus-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pazzomundo.com/?p=611#comment-167</guid>
		<description>&quot;The market passed another milestone last week and nobody noticed. The three internet stocks that stole Fairfax’s classifieds business now have a combined market capitalisation greater than Fairfax itself.

And not just a by a little bit. The combined market capitalisation of Seek, REA Group and Carsales.com is now about 10% higher than Fairfax: $4.2 billion versus $3.9 billion. It’s quite an amazing turnaround. In less than a decade, Fairfax has gone from looking ready to dominate the online classifieds industry to an also-ran in the market.

Just on some rough numbers these three companies – who provide employment, real estate and automotive classifieds respectively – appear to have done about $420 million in classified revenue in Australia.

Fairfax does not itemise online classified revenue numbers in its accounts – web-based businesses from online dating to NZ auction websites are lumped together – but my best estimate is that its Australian online classifieds earned $70–75 million last year. &quot;
http://www.eurekareport.com.au/iis/iis.nsf/lpages/RWIE-7N92AE?opendocument</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The market passed another milestone last week and nobody noticed. The three internet stocks that stole Fairfax’s classifieds business now have a combined market capitalisation greater than Fairfax itself.</p>
<p>And not just a by a little bit. The combined market capitalisation of Seek, REA Group and Carsales.com is now about 10% higher than Fairfax: $4.2 billion versus $3.9 billion. It’s quite an amazing turnaround. In less than a decade, Fairfax has gone from looking ready to dominate the online classifieds industry to an also-ran in the market.</p>
<p>Just on some rough numbers these three companies – who provide employment, real estate and automotive classifieds respectively – appear to have done about $420 million in classified revenue in Australia.</p>
<p>Fairfax does not itemise online classified revenue numbers in its accounts – web-based businesses from online dating to NZ auction websites are lumped together – but my best estimate is that its Australian online classifieds earned $70–75 million last year. &#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.eurekareport.com.au/iis/iis.nsf/lpages/RWIE-7N92AE?opendocument" rel="nofollow">http://www.eurekareport.com.au/iis/iis.nsf/lpages/RWIE-7N92AE?opendocument</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.datadiary.com.au/2009/11/23/the-empire-strikes-back-media-mogul-versus-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pazzomundo.com/?p=611#comment-178</guid>
		<description>&quot;The market passed another milestone last week and nobody noticed. The three internet stocks that stole Fairfax’s classifieds business now have a combined market capitalisation greater than Fairfax itself.

And not just a by a little bit. The combined market capitalisation of Seek, REA Group and Carsales.com is now about 10% higher than Fairfax: $4.2 billion versus $3.9 billion. It’s quite an amazing turnaround. In less than a decade, Fairfax has gone from looking ready to dominate the online classifieds industry to an also-ran in the market.

Just on some rough numbers these three companies – who provide employment, real estate and automotive classifieds respectively – appear to have done about $420 million in classified revenue in Australia.

Fairfax does not itemise online classified revenue numbers in its accounts – web-based businesses from online dating to NZ auction websites are lumped together – but my best estimate is that its Australian online classifieds earned $70–75 million last year. &quot;
http://www.eurekareport.com.au/iis/iis.nsf/lpages/RWIE-7N92AE?opendocument</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The market passed another milestone last week and nobody noticed. The three internet stocks that stole Fairfax’s classifieds business now have a combined market capitalisation greater than Fairfax itself.</p>
<p>And not just a by a little bit. The combined market capitalisation of Seek, REA Group and Carsales.com is now about 10% higher than Fairfax: $4.2 billion versus $3.9 billion. It’s quite an amazing turnaround. In less than a decade, Fairfax has gone from looking ready to dominate the online classifieds industry to an also-ran in the market.</p>
<p>Just on some rough numbers these three companies – who provide employment, real estate and automotive classifieds respectively – appear to have done about $420 million in classified revenue in Australia.</p>
<p>Fairfax does not itemise online classified revenue numbers in its accounts – web-based businesses from online dating to NZ auction websites are lumped together – but my best estimate is that its Australian online classifieds earned $70–75 million last year. &#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.eurekareport.com.au/iis/iis.nsf/lpages/RWIE-7N92AE?opendocument" rel="nofollow">http://www.eurekareport.com.au/iis/iis.nsf/lpages/RWIE-7N92AE?opendocument</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

